Movie Death DB Heading
Home | Categories | Deaths | Reports | Forums | Search | Submit a Death | Links | FAQ | Contact

Rob Roy, Archibald Cunningham (Tim Roth)

Site Rating: 85%
(ratings: 2)
Editor Rating: 90%
Writeup Rating: 87%
(ratings: 3)
Film: Rob Roy (1995)
Deceased Character: Archibald Cunningham (Tim Roth)
Archetype: Baddy (Major)
Killed by: Robert Roy MacGregor (Liam Neeson)
Killed with: Claymore


Register in our forums to rate deaths - it's free!
'Duel' icon 'Swordplay' icon 'Hacked' icon 'Revenge' icon
Offsite Links

Written by Old Bluffer 29th Jun 2005

Our hero, Robert Roy MacGregor is honour bound to duel with a swordsman who has taunted him for the entire film. His opponent is the delightfully hateful Archibald Cunningham, who has given offence by robbing MacGregor's clan, razing his house and lands, beating him to within an inch of his life, shooting his dog, murdering his fellow clansmen, causing his brother to be shot by soldiers and raping (and possibly impregnating) his wife. MacGregor would probably have forgiven most of this but Cunningham is also English, and therefore must be killed.
The only problem for the vengeful highlander, is that his upper class nemesis is unfortunately a far better swordsman than him, and he will be slaughtered with ease if they duel. Such rational thinking cannot stand in the way of pride though - it is after all "A Matter of Honour".


England vs Scotland, the Highland way. In case you are in any doubt, the Englishman is the smug looking short arse.

The resulting duel is beautifully shot and choregraphed.
MacGregor obviously just wants to rush in and chop Cunningham down like firewood, but he is too canny to attempt it. He knows his opponent is a master duellist, and it is clear from the first few exchanges that Cunningham has his blade extended, just waiting for MacGregor to step onto it.


In a duel without armour, the archaic Claymore stands no chance against the elegance of the rapier. Note Roth has removed his wig in an effort to look more deadly, but wearing that foppish blue waistcoat he doesn't really manage it.

Despite being suitably wary though, the Claymore fighter still doesn't have a chance. Cunningham's footwork is superb throughout, and he systematically slices him with deeper and deeper cuts. By the end, Rob Roy barely has the energy to lift his blade, and drags it behind him as he is forced to walk towards the Englishman before he collapses from blood loss.

Inevitably, after one last desperate attack, MacGregor takes a sickening slash across his torso, and collapses to his knees with a gasp.


In modern fencing terms, Cunningham would appear to have a slight advantage here. However, this is a movie, and kilted Scotsmen don't die easily!

It is at this point that we have to suspend our disbelief somewhat. While Cunningham awaits the nod of approval from his patron to end the Clansman's life, MacGregor takes the rapier blade in a grip of iron, picks up his own fallen claymore and gives the Englishman the cleaving he so richly deserves.
Gripping the blade isn't all that implausible, but Cunningham's reaction to it is rather out of character. He wouldn't have been so stupid as to stand idle while his opponent fumbled to regain his sword - he would have been far more likely to just whip his own blade sharply backwards out of MacGregor's grip and then deliver the coup de gras.



Here at the MDDB, this is what we like to call the "money shot."



4 categories : Duel, Swordplay, Hacked, Revenge

Register in our forums to rate our writeups - it's free!

Other Death Reviews for Rob Roy (1995)

Alan MacDonald (Eric Stoltz)
Archibald Cunningham (Tim Roth)

Last Updated: 3rd Oct 2006
This review has 6 comments. Reply to the comments
Comment 1 by 'old bluffer' (reply to this comment)
I've just rewatched this final duel to get the screengrabs and was reminded just how much I like it.

It is quite rare to see a well choreographed duel between distinctly different swords, but even forgetting the actual fighting, the scene is beautifully shot.

The Scottish nobles watching implacably, the sweat on MacGregor's face and the formal setting all make the atmosphere extremely believable as a duel.

I also like the fact that Cunningham, who really has spent the whole film being an absolute arse, still treats the affair with suitable dignity. There are no cliched taunts during the duel, both men are absolutely focused on their mutual enmity.

It is for these reasons that I try not to let the unbelievable ending bother me too much. I can just about convince myself that Cunningham, who has deep self-hating issues, is momentarily stunned to see just how indomitable a man MacGregor is.

By the way, I personally think the film should have ended with the final dialogue between MacGregor and the Duke of Argyll.

Instead, we are treated to an overly sentimental scene with full on theme music where MacGregor and his wife Mary run towards each other across a meadow (seriously).
Comment 2 by 'b.mallinder' (reply to this comment)
actually i feel that the characer of archie cunningham should have survived this duel, as the ending achieved a triumph of the bludgeon over the rapier in all its forms.
tom roth's character, presuming it is ficticious, was so expertly conceived that it deserved another outing.
the choreography was as good a piece of work as i have ever seen. and the ending which would have befitted both would have been thumbs up for rob.
archibald cunningham was such a "delightful" character that i feel the loss of him keenly,
much tribute to tim roth, i think.
Comment 3 by 'old bluffer' (reply to this comment)
Cunningham was indeed an extremely enjoyable character, but given the atrocities he'd committed upon McGregor's lands, friends, wife and family I don't think for one moment that Rob would have spared his life, even if the lairds had ordered him to.
The ending wasn't really about a claymore defeating a rapier though. On the contrary, the duel showed just how easily an expert wielding a rapier could toy with a bigger, stronger opponent armed with a cleaver.

I still think that his eventual victory was contrived, but not so much that it spoiled the film.
Comment 4 by 'b.mallinder' (reply to this comment)
i suppose that the genre of film does not normally engender a lengthy pursuit between protagonists since the film is finite. and the audience normally demands justice.
i do not see it that way, since history must be full of rogues who profited from their mis-doings.
however i would be absolutely delighted if some company were to ressurect this tale, as someone has done with robin hood apparently, and retells life and times, in a serious fashion, over a series.
i just cannot get over the portrayal and indeed the swordsmanship,real or no.
after all butch cassidy allegedly lived into the 20th century.
rogues can prosper, no rogues no plots, remember.

i hope tim roth lives forever, just because of that one roll.
Comment 5 by 'old bluffer' (reply to this comment)
More Roth malevolence may be found here: [www.moviedeaths.com]
Comment 6 by 'bmallinder' (reply to this comment)
thanks for the tips o.b.

never thought i'd let a film character steal my soul.